|
by
Allison Meyer
From
The Essence of A People II:
African Americans Who Made Their World Anew
in Loudoun County, Virginia, and Beyond
Harriet Cook, a free black woman of Leesburg, was a valued and well-regarded
member of her community. Emancipated in about 1838, when she was
approximately 32 years old, Cook supported herself by working as
a washerwoman, and she may have also served as the community’s
midwife.1 She appears to have led a quiet life, gaining considerable
respect as a skilled, trustworthy, and honest worker—until
an 1850 case made her name one of the best known in the county.
Cook had been living in Leesburg as a free woman of color for about
twelve years before turning to the network of white residents who
valued her skills to ask for their help. She wanted something that
white citizens of the state could take completely for granted: to
be a legal resident of the state of Virginia.
Cook’s apparently stable life in Leesburg was, in fact, built
on a foundation of sand. An 1806 law stipulated that manumitted
slaves were to leave the state within twelve months of gaining their
freedom. Thus, Cook—along with every other free black in the
state—could at any moment be forced to leave the state, losing
her home, her family and friends, the respected position in the
community that she had worked so hard to earn and maintain, indeed,
everything that made life worth living.
Cook had weathered at least one crisis, in 1842, managing to maintain
her residency despite a determined effort by a group of Loudoun
County citizens who petitioned the General Assembly for stiffer
enforcement of the 1806 law. It is not known what prompted her to
act on her own defense in 1850, but we can make an educated guess.
She may have feared another campaign by the forces who so strongly
opposed allowing free blacks to live in the county. The political
debates over slavery in the territories that resulted in the Compromise
of 18850, whose most salient provision was a toughened version of
the Fugitive Slave Act, stirred the passions on both sides of the
slavery issue to a fever pitch. Circumstances of a more personal
nature may have contributed to her decision, but it seems likely
that the precarious political climate may have played a role in
making her wish for the security that legal permission to remain
in the state would provide. In any case, Cook had evidently put
years of work into network building, so when she made here appeal,
she had plenty of support from prominent white citizens of Leesburg.
In January of 1850, ninety-three white citizens of Loudoun County
filed a petition with the General Assembly on Cook’s behalf.
The petitioners were a veritable “who’s who” for
the county, including seven justices of the peace, five executive
council members, sixteen merchants, six lawyers, and the postmaster.
The petition stressed the fact that Cook was an upstanding member
of the community, “sustaining a high character as a religious,
honest and valuable member of Society.”2 It noted that “serious
inconvenience” would result if she were not permitted to remain
in Leesburg; the document stressed that it would be a great hardship
were the petitioners “to be deprived of her services as a
washerwoman and in other capacities, in which in consequence of
her gentility, trustworthiness and skill she is exceedingly useful.”3
The petition did not go unanswered. Sixteen Leesburg and Loudoun
County residents filed a counter-petition, requesting that the General
Assembly deny Cook’s petition on the grounds that residency
of free blacks was not a matter for the General Assembly to decide.
“[T]he law places the remedy in such cases where it ought
to be, in the county and corporation courts,”4 the document
read.
The counter-petition’s strategy—relying on a simple
argument of jurisdiction, leaving off any arguments about the “great
and growing evil arising from the residence of the Free Black population”5
that surfaced in earlier agitation against free blacks—was
an intriguing one. It may well have been that the anti-Cook forces
sought to avoid a direct confrontation with the well-to-do citizens
who had so solidly thrown their support behind such a valuable and
upstanding member of the community.
No documents have survived confirming the legislature’s decision
in the matter. The General Assembly could have denied Cook’s
petition, sending the matter to the local courts. But it’s
worth noting that the legislature rarely denied such petitions on
behalf of free black; in the one documented instance of a rejection,
the circumstances were extraordinary.6
Census records for Loudoun County do not answer the question either.
Cook is listed nowhere in the Loudoun County rolls for 1850 and
1860. But that offers no proof that she was forced to leave, as
she failed to be recorded in the 1840 Census as well, when she was
proven by other means to be living in Leesburg.
Tax records are often the surest measure, and “Harriet Cook”
appears in those documents through 1857. No record of her is found
after 1857. And so, after writing a remarkable chapter in Loudoun
County’s history, Harriet Cook disappears from the written
record. But she leaves behind her a tantalizing glimpse of the trials
and triumphs of life as a free black in antebellum Virginia.
End Notes
1 Brenda E. Stevenson, Life in Black
and White: Family and Community in the Slave South (New York:
Oxford University Press 1996), 295
2 LCLP, 25 January 1850, Virginia State Library.
3 Ibid.
4 LCLP, 19 January 1850, Virginia State Library.
5 Stevenson 268.
6 Stevenson 273.
|
